Frequently
in the last few weeks, I’ve been drawn into "special privilege"
arguments about double-standards, as it pertains to race relations in this
country. The people I’ve discussed this with have been
-- like me -- white men.
They
bemoaned the double-standard that they see in favor of women and
minorities when it comes to speech.
There are certain words minorities are allowed to say, jokes women are
allowed to make, that white men simply are not permitted to say or do without being
attacked as “racist” or “sexist” or some other label. Political correctness – or what I'd simply call common courtesy, for simplicity’s sake – has essentially left these men
feeling like they lost some basic rights.
They feel cheated that they have no “white pride” parades, no “white
history month” and no sanction to revel in their ethnicity the way they see
minorities can.
In
short, these men feel that everybody else is getting special treatment and “free
passes” that white men are being denied.
What they fail to realize is that,
because the system’s already skewed in their favor, white men don’t need the
compensatory legitimacy that such focused endeavors provide.
Sadly,
what these men have done is confuse privileges with rights. Our basic civil and human rights, as defined
by the Constitution, its Amendments, and International Law, allow each of us
our say, our day in court and our liberty to pursue whatever dreams we see fit,
so long as nobody else is harmed in the pursuit. At least, that’s how it looks on paper. Traditionally, the reality is and has been
very different.
For
most of the history of the USA, oftentimes as much
as half the population was denied those basic rights that the average white man took – and still takes – for
granted. This means that white men had a whole slew of privileges that others were denied.
Systemically, legally,
physically and psychologically, this denial of other’s rights formed the basis
for a double-standard of privilege, based largely, if not solely, on the
pigmentation of a person’s skin. White
men could do many things that women or non-white people were legally barred
from doing. Things such as voting, working
certain jobs, owning property, speaking one’s mind, even reading
were solely in the white master’s domain for much of our history. In fact, it’s pretty easy to argue that the
sole basis for white men’s privilege in this country was the denial of
black men their equally-due rights. This
skewed dis-equity affects our society to this day.
In
time, that skewing of privilege has begun to balance out, which means that women
and minorities have gained the opportunity to speak out and compensate for
their long-standing second-class status with speech, if little else more
material, thus far. Affirmative action was implemented
by law in the economic sphere to attempt to compensate for the artificial advantages
that white men had for so long enjoyed, so that those who'd been left behind would have the opportunity to catch up. This trend of equalization threatens the feeling of privilege that white men have so long taken for
granted that now, many feel that they have lost rights long taken for granted,
when in fact all they are losing are first-class privileges so that those
around them could gain real rights at long last.
The
most visible response of “white pride” is violent, traditionally manifesting in
and forever identifying itself with rampant murder and terrorism, most commonly
wrapped in a white sheet. To this day,
such “White Pride” groups still advocate violent repression of women and
minorities, closely emulating the style of groups this country is has been or
is currently at war with (Nazi Germany and ISIS being the two best examples). This is a defense of privilege, not right.
Yes, folks, the Nazis were and still are the ENEMY |
What these men
fail to consider is that while those skewed privileges have indeed in recent
years been somewhat scaled back in many areas of our national life, they do
still exist both subtly and overtly in force across the nation.
The
numbers don't lie.
Today,
white
men occupy 75-85% of the positions of power in the economic, social and
political spheres in this country as they have for 400 years by
systemically-skewed extra-legal privileges across the board. We make
more than the women doing the same jobs beside us. We have more political power than our
minority counterparts and have much easier access to the levers of that political
power. When you factor in the rampant
abuse of minorities by the justice system, the Eurocentric
curriculum in public schools when it comes to teaching history and the various
educational and economic disparities that continue to skew opportunities
towards white men, affirmative action, realistically, is little more than a tiny
band-aid on a gaping national wound.
Every
day is white men’s day. Every month is
white history month. It has been this
way for so long that it’s taken entirely for granted.
Now,
before the usual detractors start freaking out about hating one’s ethnicity or “reverse-racism”,
let me be absolutely clear – my point is
not about hating white people. I
consider myself extremely fortunate that, by the sheer accident of the
circumstances of my birth, I have directly benefitted from a skewed system. All I’m
saying is that all my fellow citizens, regardless of skin color, gender or
country of origin deserve the same as I got.
It is never tantamount to calling white people
“evil” to point out that a whole swath of my fellow citizens got massively
short-ended by that same skewed system. Nor
is it “reverse-racist” to insist that such short-ending be curbed. It is a
taking-on of the historical burden of responsibility that comes with my
privileged position.
The
so-called “White Pride Movement” would do well to remember that with the pride
it seeks to revel comes an historical burden to bear. In this case, that burden
manifests as putting up with a very minor "double-standard" when it
comes to discourse. This burden is the natural price of the privileges we currently enjoy.
Ultimately,
it is the fear of being on the receiving end of the second-class status that is
being a minority in this country is what scares so many white folks into the
ranks of Regressivism. As I’ve argued in
a previous blog
post , the era of white supremacy in this country based solely on
demographic numbers is ending. The
most recent Census data confirms this. This means that for the first time since the
end of the Indian Wars,
white people will officially be a minority ethnicity on this continent. If we are to avoid a repetition of history in
the reverse, it’s incumbent on those of us who've benefitted from this skewed
system to lay down our privileges gracefully and to support all efforts to
balance the scales rather than deride those efforts. If we don’t lead the way towards a more
equitable system, we will in the end be squashed when it finally does come
about.
If,
at the end of the day, the only thing I can do is to make every effort to show
common courtesy, and help rebalance things by enduring harmless jokes, or the
occasional chip on another’s shoulder, or the occasional pride parade, the
worst I’ve lost is the privilege of being a bully about it. I don’t lose a single legal right by giving
up that privilege. I will not lose any rights if ALL of my fellow citizens finally are
allowed to use theirs. The worst I'll have to give up in the service of justice is the demand for extra-legal
privileges denied to my fellow citizens.
I
can live with that.
So, the idea is that it's okay to show bigotry and prejudice to a whole group of people because some portion--maybe even a large portion--showed bigotry and prejudice first?
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry, that sounds more like looking for revenge than looking for equality. It's the old "they did it to us, so it's okay for us to do it to them" defense.
You do understand what scares a lot white people is the thought that maybe revenge and domination is the motive, not equality?
How exactly does the revocation of extra-legal privilege constitute "bigotry" to you, Max?
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete