I’ve been pondering over the last week how
best to express my feelings at the sheer audacity of two nearly identical
incidents of white police officers murdering unarmed black men in Ferguson and
Staten Island,
and walking away scot-free, with little to no accountability for their
actions.
The failure of two Grand Juries
to indict these cops, confirming years of To
Kill a Mockingbird cases across the country for far too long, combined with the over-militarization of police
forces around the country tells me that the deepest cornerstone of American
Law – specifically the Rights of
Miranda and Habeas
Corpus has effectively been taken away from the citizenry.
That by itself is enough to send Patriotic
terror through my very soul. What’s
worse, though, is that a very big obstacle to fixing this issue is that too many
are still clinging to the opinion that the cops are justified in using lethal
force against unarmed citizens. These
are content-weak and vitriolic attempts to make what clearly is an issue of
police management and racial equality NOT about what these cases clearly are
all about.
I’ve heard a lot of variations on “He broke the law and deserved what he got”. This is what’s known as blaming the victim. Nobody – regardless of
race, creed or color -- deserves a summary execution without trial for
shoplifting, nor does anybody deserve a summary brutal execution for standing
up for themselves when a cop harasses them without reading them their rights. There's submitting to
rule of law and then there's submitting to the abuse of law. The two are very different things. What this
argument essentially is calling for is the blind and knee-jerk submission to
the law, even if it's very clearly being abused -- arguments in line with Loyalist thinking back in the
1770’s. As history has shown, those
arguments didn't hold true then and it doesn't hold true now.
“He was
resisting arrest” is another common refrain I’m hearing from police
supporters, which I’d say is one of the main variations of the victim blaming
argument above. In Eric Garner's case, we have the video. He's very clearly
doing what any of us would do if we were running out of a store we'd stopped
off at to stop a parking ticket from being put on the windshield of our
standing car. Yes, bootleg cigarettes
are illegal, but on the same level as parking in a “no parking” zone or
jaywalking -- certainly not deserving of tactics designed for hostage-takers.
But the way things are now, for a white person
like me, trying to reason with the cops is acceptable behavior and the worst I
can expect is to be handed a ticket anyway. For a black person, it's a death sentence. This double-standard has already bled over
from merely the minority communities to all economically disadvantaged and
downtrodden – no matter their skin color.
Children
are literally dying every day in America at the hands of a police force that has
become an occupying army, rather than a band of officers of the peace.
Are you comfortable living
in a society in which your own kids or your kids’ friends stand a good chance
of getting gunned down by a uniformed cop for jaywalking and having no avenue to
seek redress?
For those of us who’re
getting
off of the sidelines and standing up, most are objecting to the abuse --
not the rule, but the abuse -- of law and figuring out for ourselves how we as
citizens can do something about it so that the law can serve the interests of
the average person, as it was designed initially to do. I can't imagine
anything more quintessentially American. It's not a question of "America:
Love it or Leave it", as so many Regressives will default to, it's a
question of how to fulfill the Preamble
of the Constitution and do what we can to perfect an imperfect Union.
When it comes to peace officers, we allow them a badge and a gun
as the privilege that comes with the responsibility of holding to the highest
standards of ethical behavior. Now, we
have incident
after incident
after incident
after incident
of cops targeting minority communities for non-violent misdemeanor crimes and
using excess – often lethal -- force every time. There are simply too many cases of deliberate
excessive lethal force among the cops over too long a period of time for the “few
bad apples" argument to carry any weight.
The entire police force – including the “bad apples” that perpetuate
violence and the “good apples” that refuse to check their brothers-in-arms – has
been exposed as unworthy of their position across the board. While excessive force is this commonplace and
legally sanctioned, I'm afraid anybody who wears the uniform is now officially suspect. I advise all my readers to avoid contact with
the police at all costs.
The whole point of Habeas Corpus and Miranda is that the citizen
should be protected from unwarranted search and seizure. The fact that the cops
are ignoring this -- in particular with the minority community -- should be
enough to make even the most ardent Regressive take notice.
And to those who
inevitably accuse me of “race-baiting”, I can only say that it's not and never was “race-baiting” to point out real systemic racism. Asserting that it is
essentially is a "know your place, N-word" argument that doesn't hold
up in the face of facts. As a white man from an upper-middle-class neighborhood, I grew up with certain privileges as a citizen. It's hardly "race-baiting" to insist that my fellow citizens be guaranteed the same rights and privileges I enjoy when they most clearly aren't getting that guarantee.
While all of us as citizens have a duty to stand up with respect, dignity and civility, the real burden of responsibility remains with
those holding the badge. Since
those carrying badges won’t stand up for the legal inborn rights of the
citizenry, then it’s time for us – We, the People
-- to stand up and do it ourselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment